Hello Dear Readers,
Today in this post, I will provide some deep insight into the Signal Electromigration (Signal EM): Violations, Examples, and Practical Fixes.
1. Introduction:
As technology nodes shrink into the deep‑submicron and nanometer regime (7nm, 5nm, 3nm and beyond), electromigration (EM) has become a first‑order reliability concern—not only for power/ground (PG) networks but also for signal nets. Signal EM failures are often underestimated because signal currents are transient and bidirectional. However, with higher switching activity, tighter metal pitches, thinner wires, and aggressive timing closure, signal EM can cause latent or early‑life failures if not addressed properly.
This article explains:
What Signal EM is and how it differs from PG EM
Typical Signal EM violation scenarios
Detailed, practical examples
Root causes behind each violation
Proven solutions and best practices to fix and prevent Signal EM issues
2. What is Signal Electromigration:
Electromigration is the transport of metal atoms caused by momentum transfer from conducting electrons. Over time, this atomic movement leads to:
Voids → increased resistance → open circuits
Hillocks → shorts to neighboring wires
Signal EM vs Power EM
| Aspect | Power EM | Signal EM |
|---|---|---|
| Current nature | Mostly DC / unidirectional | Transient, bidirectional |
| Analysis mode | Average / RMS current | Peak, RMS, duty‑cycle based |
| Affected nets | VDD/VSS straps, rails | Clocks, resets, buses, high‑toggle nets |
| Common misconception | Always critical | Often ignored (but dangerous) |
Even though signal current reverses direction, current density peaks during switching edges can exceed EM limits, especially on clocks and high‑fanout nets.
3. Why Signal EM is Critical in Advanced Nodes:
Signal EM risk increases due to:
Narrower metal widths → higher current density
Higher operating frequencies → more switching events
Large capacitive loads (CTS buffers, long routes)
Aggressive cell downsizing
Multi‑bit flop and high‑drive clock buffers
A signal EM failure may pass functional tests but fail after weeks or months in the field, making it a serious reliability risk.
4. Key Parameters in Signal EM Analysis:
Signal EM tools (Voltus, Voltus Fi, RedHawk‑SC, Totem, etc.) typically evaluate:
Peak Current Density (Jpeak)
RMS Current Density (Jrms)
Effective Duty Cycle
Metal width and thickness
Temperature
Via count and enclosure
Violation condition (simplified):
5. Common Signal EM Violation Scenarios (with Examples):
Example 1: Clock Net EM Violation
Scenario
High‑frequency clock (2–4 GHz)
Driven by strong CTS buffers
Routed using minimum‑width M2/M3
Observed Violation
EM report flags multiple segments with RMS current density > limit
Root Cause
Very high toggle rate (≈100%)
Large cumulative sink capacitance
Narrow metal width
Fix / Solution
Promote clock routing to higher metal layers (M5/M6)
Increase wire width (NDR or clock rule)
Insert additional clock buffers to reduce segment current
Use shielded clock routes (improves both SI and EM)
Example 2: Reset Net with Unexpected EM Violation
Scenario
Global reset net
Considered low‑activity logically
Physically very long with many sinks
Observed Violation
EM violation during stress or test modes
Root Cause
Reset toggles heavily during scan/test
Large fanout causes high instantaneous current
Tool considers worst‑case activity, not functional assumption
Fix / Solution
Break reset into regional reset trees
Add intermediate buffers
Route reset on wider metal
Apply correct activity annotation (if justified and sign‑off approved)
Example 3: Data Bus EM Violation
Scenario
128‑bit data bus
High switching probability
Minimum‑width horizontal routing
Observed Violation
Multiple EM hotspots on middle segments
Root Cause
Simultaneous switching of many bits
Long parallel segments increasing current per wire
Fix / Solution
Increase wire width or spacing
Use higher metal layers for long bus routes
Segment the bus using repeaters
Consider bus encoding (architecture‑level fix)
Example 4: Via‑Related Signal EM Violation
Scenario
Signal drops from M6 to M2 using a single via
High drive strength cell
Observed Violation
Via EM failure reported
Root Cause
Via current density exceeds limit
Single via cannot handle peak current
Fix / Solution
Add multiple vias (via array)
Improve via enclosure
Re‑route to avoid sharp layer drops
Example 5: Tool Mismatch (Voltus vs RedHawk‑SC)
Scenario
Same design analyzed in two tools
Different EM numbers reported
Root Cause
Different activity assumptions
Different waveform modeling
Temperature or metal tech file mismatch
Fix / Solution
Ensure same:
Liberty files
Switching activity (VCD/SAIF)
Temperature corners
Tech EM limits
Compare segment‑level current, not only violation count
6. Step‑by‑Step Methodology to Fix Signal EM Violations
Step 1: Classify the Net
Clock / Reset / Data / Control
High toggle or low toggle
Step 2: Identify the Failing Segment
Long wire?
Narrow metal?
Single via?
Step 3: Apply Physical Fixes (Preferred)
Increase wire width
Move to higher metal
Add shielding
Add vias
Step 4: Logical Fixes (If Needed)
Add buffers
Reduce fanout
Net segmentation
Step 5: Activity‑Based Fixes (Last Resort)
Refine switching activity
Mode‑based EM analysis
Apply waivers only with sign‑off approval
7. Best Practices to Prevent Signal EM Issues
Use non‑default routing rules (NDRs) for clocks and global nets
Avoid minimum‑width routing for long, high‑fanout signals
Prefer higher metals early in floorplanning
Add via arrays by default for high‑drive pins
Run early EM checks (pre‑CTS and post‑CTS)
Treat signal EM as a design requirement, not ECO cleanup
8. Conclusion:
Signal electromigration is no longer a corner‑case issue—it is a core reliability challenge in advanced nodes. Clocks, resets, and high‑activity data paths are especially vulnerable due to high current density and aggressive routing.
A robust Signal EM strategy combines:
Early awareness
Correct activity modeling
Strong physical design practices
Minimal reliance on waivers
By addressing Signal EM proactively, designers can avoid costly late‑stage ECOs and ensure long‑term silicon reliability.
Comments
Post a Comment